Jump to content

Talk:Henry VIII

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Henry VIII of England)
Former featured articleHenry VIII is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 3, 2005.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 18, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
February 7, 2007Featured article reviewDemoted
April 15, 2013Good article nomineeListed
February 18, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 24, 2004, July 11, 2004, July 11, 2005, July 12, 2006, April 21, 2009, April 21, 2010, April 21, 2011, April 21, 2013, April 21, 2016, April 21, 2018, April 21, 2022, and January 24, 2024.
Current status: Former featured article

Wiki Ed

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2022 and 6 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hdgoble (article contribs).

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria, due to uncited text in the article including most of "Succession" and the entire "Style and arms" section. Also, at over 11,000 words, I think this article is WP:TOOBIG and some of the prose can be spun out or removed as too much detail. Is anyone willing to address these concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 21:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Loved the Henry the eighth bio! It just needs a little tuneup!

[edit]

I so enjoyed this bio and learned quite a bit from about Henry Viii. It might be long and have various errors but it is easy to see all the work put into it. It just needs some fine tuning. I would also like to see "jousting" added to the tournament. This particular tournament changed Henry's life forever and how he handled so many situations/opposition/wives with a dramatic beheading. I love wikipedia and all the terrific information that has been collected for this encyclopedia. Special "hello" to wonderful HouseBlaster!! Creative Lizzie (talk) 18:45, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is uncited prose in the article, particularily in the "Succession" and "Style and arms" sections. I think redundant and off-topic text has crept into the article, and I think a copyedit would be useful to tighten up the prose and remove excess text. Particularly, I think the "Execution of Anne Boleyn" section focuses too much on Boleyn and much of this text can be moved to her article, with the section placing more emphasis on Henry's actions. Z1720 (talk) 23:11, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'll be able to fix the uncited issues. Can you identify the other text you think should be trimmed or removed? --Chronicler Frank (talk) 21:41, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Chronicler Frank: I think a subject matter expert can go through the article and remove extra detail from the article, or try to state ideas more succinctly. Here's some specific places that I think can be trimmed or cut:
  • "Wives, mistresses, and children: What is the purpose of this blockquote? I think it can be removed as unencyclopedic and too focused on his personality, instead of what the section is about.
  • "Government": Lots of talk about Cromwell and Wolsey, perhaps this would be better in a spun out article about Henry's government.
  • The block quote in "Historiography": why does a person writing in the 1950s get a whole paragraph, instead of having their research summarised in the article?
While I would do this myself, often my ideas of where to trim are met with complaints that I cut too many important details. If others are interested, I am happy to do this work. Z1720 (talk) 23:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm quite inclined to agree on spinning out some government stuff (into what would surely be a quite interesting article in its own right) and using a more concise summary style. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 05:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Chronicler Frank: Are you still interested in working on this article? Z1720 (talk) 13:58, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: Yes, I am still looking for citations. Chronicler Frank (talk) 08:43, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Chronicler Frank any updates? All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (Ughhh.... What did I do wrong this time?) 13:13, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.