A fact from Henriette Spitzeder appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 June 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: Should we also mention that Mozart's opera was still quite young then (but we don't know exactly when they sang it together, between 1816 and 1819)? (if yes how?) ... that she died giving birth to their tenth child, not even age 28? (if yes how?)
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Everything looks good to me. I'm AGF on the references, because they aren't in English. Copyvio OK, new enough, length is good. I suggested a wording change on the proposed hook & suggested another hook related to her death bearing her last child. Gerda Arendt, are you OK with any of the hooks? I have a preference for ALT2 but am fine with any of them. QuakerSquirrel (talk) 18:17, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the review, QuakerSquirrel, but you are a bit too fast ;) - Seriously, you made two mistakes, 1) you shouldn't place any hooks above my signature, making them look as if I wrote them, 2) you should not approve hooks you wrote. I am not happy about ALT1 as it is because she certainly didn't perform in English, nor ALT3 because it seems a bit tabloid style to me. But how is this, based on your ALT1:
Thanks Gerda Arendt -- now I know better. I just thought all hooks went at the top. ALT1a looks good to me. Does that mean that any time a reviewer suggests a new hook, they have to wait for a new reviewer? QuakerSquirrel (talk) 19:18, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Almost every time. If you just rephrase, as ALT1, you can argue that it isn't a new hook, but ALT2 is. You can do several things if you feel like proposing a new hook: 1) you suggest it to the nominator, 2) intentionally or not what happened here: you propose something the nominator will change, and then you can approve the variant, 3) you take the symbol from above, "new reviewer needed". If you want to approve ALT1a, go ahead, get the symbol down here and strike all others. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:01, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]