Talk:Helsby hill fort

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cheshire Low‑importance

	Cheshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

subject of article?

The subject of this article would appear to be 'Helsby Hill' though with considerable mention made of the hillfort. Either the article ought to be re-named as 'Helsby Hill' and with a section devoted to the hill fort or else another article be made on Helsby Hill (or a section developed within the article on Helsby) and this one be restricted to the hillfort. Any thoughts? cheers Geopersona (talk) 13:28, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article was written as part of a series of Hillforts in Cheshire (see the relevant category) and as such I would prefer it to remain as a separate article (and to be expanded as appropriate). --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 14:52, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. I came to the page via a search for 'Helsby Hill' which I wished to link in to a new article I've created for the Sherwood Sandstone Group of which the Helsby Sandstone is a constituent geological formation. Having subsequently found the section on the main Helsby page dedicated to Helsby Hill (I somehow contrived to miss it before), I'll point my article there. cheers Geopersona (talk) 16:37, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]