Talk:Heaton Norris
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Cultural references
[edit]To User:Malleus_Fatuorum. "Good god!" is your rationale for removing my addition. Why remove it? To the average British person, Heaton Norris means nothing. But fans of Mrs Merton will know it through her, therefore giving the town a minor claim to fame, which should be recognised rather than ignored! --TheoMorgan (talk) 23:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC) And I see it's been removed again. It isn't "trivia", but even if it is, why remove it? Who says you're in charge of this page? Plenty of other Wiki pages about places do have "cultural references". Just look at the Manchester page, for example. Very silly. I mean, the article is pretty boring and dry without it. --TheoMorgan (talk) 10:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- The first issue is that you need a reliable source to back up the text you wish to add. The other problem is that I am not sure it is particularly significant in relation to an encyclopaedia article about the area; it is mentioned by a character in a fictional show.. a lot of shows do that and usually we do not record that matter (as trivial). --Errant (chat!) 10:36, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- I agree that it is trivia and does not belong in the article. LadyofShalott 10:37, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- I would have removed it if I'd seen it first. This is a settlement article not a repository for such trivia.--J3Mrs (talk) 11:02, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Several editors have said the addition of trivia is not a good idea so it would be in your interests to stop adding it.--J3Mrs (talk) 11:52, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- I agree that it is trivia and does not belong in the article. LadyofShalott 10:37, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Heaton Norris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120322014022/http://www.stockport.gov.uk/2013/2978/8803/9020/12299/heatonmoorapp?a=5 to http://www.stockport.gov.uk/2013/2978/8803/9020/12299/heatonmoorapp?a=5
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071001032159/http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10354948 to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10354948
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120322014057/http://www.stockport.gov.uk/2013/2978/8803/9020/12299/greenlaneapp?a=5441 to http://www.stockport.gov.uk/2013/2978/8803/9020/12299/greenlaneapp?a=5441
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130818002043/http://www.nelstrop.co.uk/company-history to http://www.nelstrop.co.uk/company-history
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)