Jump to content

Talk:Harvela Investments Ltd v Royal Trust of Canada (CI) Ltd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The reporting of this case in the synopsed 'facts' is missleading. The House Of Lords ruled in favour of Harvela - stating that a referential bid did not satisfy the demands of the seller in that they require a 'specific' amount.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.37.7.247 (talk) 15:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]