Talk:Hale v. Henkel
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
A fact from Hale v. Henkel appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 October 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Two suggestions for future improvements
[edit]DaltonCastle, thanks so much for creating this article; Hale is an incredibly important (and interesting) case, and I am happy to see that it is now covered in our Encyclopedia. I have two suggestions for future improvements for this article:
- When citing to the Court's opinion, could you please include page numbers for the page of the United States Reports on which the cited material appears? Also, per MOS:LAW, I recommend using Bluebook citations. You can find a template at Template:Ussc.
- I would recommend covering the Fourth Amendment that were discussed in this case.
Thanks, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 09:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hey thanks for the advice! I am currently preparing another article but I can get around to it eventually. Glad you like it so far. DaltonCastle (talk) 05:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class U.S. Supreme Court articles
- Mid-importance U.S. Supreme Court articles
- WikiProject SCOTUS articles
- Start-Class law articles
- Mid-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles