Talk:Hableh

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

A fact from Hableh appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 May 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Palestinian village of Hableh is located on a rocky ridge in which there are numerous ancient cisterns cut into the rock?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/May.

Wikipedia

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

refs for Habla 148174

Masalha (1997, p4) says most of Habla was destroyed on 22 June 1967. I don't have this source. Zero^talk 05:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Guerin, Samarie II", p367-8. Zero^talk 05:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dauphin, p803. Zero^talk 05:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can't seem to find Habla in Samaria Tome II [1]. Any tips on how to spell it? Tiamut^talk 08:50, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind I found it [2]. Tiamut^talk 09:12, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

See this. Is there any way to make a copy or derivative work of this? As you can see, Habla is completely encirlced by the barrier along with Ras Atiya. Its as bad as Qalqilya. I'm looking for sources that discuss this further (here's one, but I don't know much about Occupational Hazard and am worried it won't be accepted as RS by those seeking to keep such information out). Anyway, thoughts on how we can get a representation of this image, if any? Tiamut^talk 09:54, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can draw a portion of this public-domain CIA map for 2008. But it would be worth tracking down the background for the indications "Completed fence: to be dismantled" (thin solid red line) and "Planned fence" (dotted red line). Zero^talk 10:21, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can find. Tiamut^talk 10:37, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How about this map? The boundaries of the built-up areas are indistinct on the CIA map and so might need correction yet. Please tell me of any errors. Zero^talk 14:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That looks great. I see two minor typos ("Suppose" should be "supposed" and "Kirbat Ra's at Tirah" should be "Khirbat ...."), but otherwise, excellent. Thanks very much Zero0000. Tiamut^talk 15:16, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Zero^talk 15:39, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. I've added it here and at Ras Atiya, Azzun, Qalqilya, among others. Cheers. Tiamut^talk 15:48, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hableh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110303235435/http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=454 to http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=454

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]