Jump to content

Talk:HM Advocate v Salmond

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

merge discussion (Result:Delete)

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Reason: Not enough content for a full article. Should this just be a section? RhinosF1 (talk) 21:07, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For now, I'd suggest keeping this all within the Salmond article. It may be -- indeed probably will be -- enough for a separate article in due course, but it could be months before we can say anything more. Bondegezou (talk) 21:15, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the article, it seems like most of the content is already there so feel free to change to a proposed deletion as duplicating content. RhinosF1 (talk) 21:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's not needed even as a redirect: anyone interested would search for Alex Salmond, not HM Advocate..., so deletion is preferable. An encyclopedia shouldn't have articles on trials that can/in all likelihood can be summarised adequately in the main article on the accused. EddieHugh (talk) 22:13, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've changed to an AfD discussion RhinosF1 (talk) 07:16, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RhinosF1 (talk) 07:19, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Identification

[edit]

I would add that the Crown Office have tweeted a few days ago that there is a court order preventing the publication of the names of the alleged victims in this case. PatGallacher (talk) 19:47, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They also tweeted two hours ago that this court order still stands. PatGallacher (talk) 19:27, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]