Talk:HMS Glowworm (H92)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Glowworm (H92) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

HMS Glowworm (H92) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 12, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Shipwrecks Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

Lady Elizabeth (1879)
- Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
- Improve grammar
- Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
- Discuss desired additions -None

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Battle of the April storm

No mention of "Battle of the April Storm"? This is Larry Forrester's fictionalized account of Glowworm's encounter with the Admiral Hipper. The characters are made up (mostly with different names), but the sequence of events seems to match pretty well with the description here on Wikipedia.

I was going to ask the same question! The book is mentioned in Roope's Wiki page. It was a great story of redemption for this thirteen-year-old!! http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Gerard_Broadmead_Roope — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mofo80503 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Glowworm (H92)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk) 11:08, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks interesting, should be able to complete a full review in next few days. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 11:08, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Technical review

No dab links.
Not sure what value is added by the uboat.net external link.
- Legacy, but gone now.

Prose

...she encountered the German destroyers Z11 Bernd von Arnim and then Z18 Hans Lüdemann in the heavy fog before 08:00 a.m. -- Grammatically it looks a bit odd to have "then" where you do, given you have the descripter "German destroyers" embracing both. I assume you mean that Glowworm found one before the other but if the time difference between the two encounters wasn't too large I think you could easily lose this word -- doesn't seem vital.
- It was in sequence, albeit fairly close, so I'm happy to lose the word.

Structure

Always prefer to see at least two subheaders under a section heading though I realise it's not simple with a mix of pre-war and early wartime stuff prior to the final battle. What if Career became Operational history and you gave the first part of the section an Early career subheader?
- Works for me.

Coverage/Referencing

No issues.

Supporting materials

All images appropriately licensed and captioned.
Although not required, alt text might be worth adding.

Summary

Pls check that I haven't unintentionally altered any meaning with my brief copyedit. Basically this looks fine but like to get response to the above points before passing. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 03:46, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:29, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Cool, passing as GA -- well done. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 06:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns

I'm deeply puzzled that there are so few sources for the account of the final action; particularly so as the article is significantly at odds with other accounts to be found elsewhere. Roope's VC citation clearly states that he deliberately rammed the Hipper and crew member Duncan Blair states that the captain gave the order 'prepare to ram'. There are numerous other such accounts and at least one photograph exists showing the very serious extent of damage to the Hipper's starboard side which does suggest she was rammed. Given that fact, and supposing that the longstanding story has been somehow shown to be incorrect, surely at least some reference should be made to the differing accounts? Erwfaethlon (talk) 16:15, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]