Talk:HMS Colossus (1910)

HMS Colossus (1910) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 9, 2017. (Reviewed version).

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Colossus (1910)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 07:17, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is in pretty good shape.

In the lead, which battle?
The displacement in the text and infobox doesn't match.
link shp in text
link Port and starboard
probably worth specifying that the secondary guns were in single mounts
After introducing BS as an abbreviation, suggest referring to 1st BS and subsequent mentions of BS
link Home Fleet at first mention
suggest linking mobilisation
link dreadnought at sixteen dreadnoughts
1900 should be 19:00
The sentence beginning During the battle has a repetition of "during the battle"
suggest and was refitted to suit her new role
suggest and she returned to Devonport where she was again listed for disposal
images are all appropriately licensed and captioned.

That's me done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:33, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching these mistakes. I'll wait on your responses in the Hercules review on the dreadnought and Home Fleet links before doing anything here.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I always think it is worth linking at first mention in the body, but it's not a requirement, so I'm ok either way. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:57, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, and is illustrated by appropriately license images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]