Talk:Green theory
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 25 April 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Realism in international relations - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 19:02, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Move to Green theory
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 08:53, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Green theory (international relations) → Green theory – Unnecessary disambiguation. Apparently the argument that Green theory is a redlink was ignored in the earlier discussion... Can't see why we would need a disambiguator since this is the only page with this title. Jafeluv (talk) 14:18, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories:
- Stub-Class politics articles
- Unknown-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Stub-Class International relations articles
- High-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- Stub-Class Alternative views articles
- Unknown-importance Alternative views articles
- WikiProject Alternative views articles
- Stub-Class Environment articles
- Unknown-importance Environment articles