Talk:Greater Grand Forks

United States: North Dakota Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Dakota portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Dakota.

Untitled

If anyone can find a better image or logo, feel free to replace the one that I just put up for the CVB. I know it is too small. --MatthewUND 05:42, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

Are you sure Nelson County should be considered as part of the Greater Grand Forks area? TRBUFF 22:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be a good idea, MatthewUND, if you could cite some sources as what is the "Greater Grand Forks" area. From what I've heard, it's basically the cities of Grand Forks and East Grand Forks. If you want to say it's the two counties defined in the Census Bureau's current definition of the Grand Forks-East Grand Forks, ND-MN Metropolitan Statistical Area, that's fine too. However, I think the additional counties listed (lighter red and the orange) are pushing it... You could even say that three of those counties on the bottom might even belong even more with the Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area since it has more influence, for example... MatthewNDSU (talk) 09:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, when you get to the eastern edge of Polk County, you're getting more in the influence of Bemidji.--RLent (talk) 18:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greater Grand Forks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]