Talk:Grant Mudford

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Grant Mudford is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Photography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I protest the removal of "bio" information. Firstly, it isn't bio information but a description of work. This is a typical part of many articles about artists. To remove it seems to me to be a loss, and unnecessary. Slpayne 05:18, 3 September 2007 (UTC) Unsourced bio information removed as per Wikipedia's bio guidelines: [1] which says "Be very firm about the use of high quality references. Remove immediately and without discussion any unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material — whether negative, positive, or just questionable — about living persons from Wikipedia articles,[2] talk pages, user pages, and project space." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jenafalt (talk • contribs) 10:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC) How is it contentious? Bring up any article about an artist and it will contain descriptions of work. These are not sourced, because there is no reference. Slpayne 00:09, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]