Jump to content

Talk:Gordon Cooper (American football)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Premeditated Chaos talk 00:58, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that football player Gordon Cooper performed so well that "the adjective supply [was] exhausted" in trying to describe him?
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Judy Kellogg Markowsky
  • Comment: Was busy yesterday and forgot to nominate on time; requesting a one day extension per WP:DYKG, which states The seven-day limit can be extended for a day or two upon request.
Created by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 190 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: When including the one day extension, the article is indeed new enough. I find the hook to be interested, and the source, being AP, is credible. The fact is also mentioned in the article. Marking as approved. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC) Hey man im josh (talk) 14:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Gordon Cooper (American football)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 19:15, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 20:10, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • I feel like we should change "national receiving leader" in the lead and body to "national receptions leader" to be clearer. Receiving leader could also mean yards.
  • "in American Legion leagues" is that the same thing as American Legion Baseball. If so, wikilink it.
  • Add "first-team All-Skyline Conference in all three seasons at Denver" to infobox.
  • "As a senior in 1951, he broke Art Weiner's record for career receptions" Is that a school record or national record? Make it clearer please.
  • The body says he coached wrestling at Rifle but infoxbox doesn't say that. Maybe change to "Football, baseball, wrestling, and track coach"?

I think that's all. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:11, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.