Jump to content

Talk:Glamourina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello Racconish. The first reference confirms she is popular, but I deleted it in order to avoid -WP:NPOV and WP:WEASEL ... but you re-added it. Isn't it better to take it out and write as I did: http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Glamourina&diff=next&oldid=460322283 --Pikks (talk) 19:31, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was just intending to show you how to quote AND translate the quote. Acccording to this page, Agnieszka Gałczyńska is a student, not a professional journalist, so yes, it's better not to use this source. Cheers, — Racconish Tk 19:40, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Whether it's a student or not, she works for a company that makes reliable information. Being a student or not it doesn't mean that the person isn't good in something or is not reliable. By the way, I didn't get how to fill the templates ''<ref>{{cite web|publisher=[[:pl:Miasto kobiet (magazyn)|Miasto kobiet]]|title=Jesienne stylizacje polskich blogerek|trans_title=|language=Polish|url=http://www.miastokobiet.pl/trendy-blogerki/|last=Gałczyńska|first=Agnieszka|date=|accessdate=|quote=November 12, 2011}}</ref>{{verify source|date=November 2011}}<!--'' where should the quote appear? Other links do not have so many data. If the quote is XYZ, where should it appear? --Pikks (talk) 19:56, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Changes applied, now the article is good. Should there be anything else to enhance, please let me know. --Pikks (talk) 22:05, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stylist - designer

[edit]

Hi Racconish, you have applied some changes to the article which I do not agree with. You have changed the | occupation = Fashion Blogger,Stylist to | occupation = Fashion blogger and designer. The word "designer" does not appear anywhere. A designer is a person that creates the clothes, their concept. The stylist is a person that creates the outfits (combination of clothes). I suggest to say the truth, according to what she does and what is confirmed by the sources. I suggest to change it back to | occupation = Fashion blogger and stylist. Thank you. --Pikks (talk) 17:36, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Thanks, — Racconish Tk 17:41, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok cool, thanks. Will you change it or I will do it? (asking to avoid saving it at the same time) --Pikks (talk) 17:55, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just did it myself :) --★ Pikks ★ : MsG 20:19, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]

Racconish, even though it is confirmed many times in the references, I prefer to keep the article as neutral and 3rd party as possible. I deleted all the words "popular", "famous", etc. However you have re-added them in the last edits. You wrote "Her blog soon became popular". That's right, however I would change it to "Her blog soon became noticed by international and local companies" or as it was before "Glamourina initially worked mainly with Polish online clothing stores which wanted to publicize their brands to Glamourina’s readers.". What do you think? --Pikks (talk) 17:48, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It should be explained somwhere, preferably in the leade, why the subject is of encyclopedic interest.— Racconish Tk 21:59, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, so I won't change that. Your changes will remain, so that the lead has the necessary information for it to be in Wiki. --★ Pikks ★ MsG 13:28, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Events section

[edit]

Hello Racconish, I agree with the other changes you did. They made the article to look very professional and reliable, and thanks also for discussing the notability. I appreciate that now the problem is resolved.
However the last thing is the events section. Since in the article the main topics are the events in which she took part, I am convinced that it would be good to restore the events section. Where there is only the date and the name of the event. Just like a summary, without any other data. Do you agree with this change? Thank you, --Pikks (talk) 17:52, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would find it repetitive. I suggest saying it once would be enough, wherever.— Racconish Tk 21:57, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, we'll leave it without a separate "event" section. --★ Pikks ★ MsG 13:33, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glamourina1.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Glamourina1.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:01, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Glamourina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Glamourina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:50, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:Glamourina&oldid=1206435762"