Talk:Ghana Ali

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"26 November 2017"

Hi! I made a few edits to the page, which somehow have been reverted.

First, Dr. Blofeld probably made an edit conflict. When I edited page, there was no tag of Template:In use (rare condition) on the page so I didn't knew. Also, according to edit history, the very last edit before me was of about an hour earlier.
Secondly, Saqib reverted to his revision, and when I messaged on User talk:NeilN#Saqib per his edit summary, no one responded.

However, I didn't add any content, I just filled the citation templates and inserted native name into infobox instead of the intro prose. Also, I thought Ghana Ali is Pakistani, better to tag the article with Template:Use Pakistani English. But now I could say I shouldn't have tagged it to Template:Use dmy dates per WP:CITEVAR, well I did it as per normal dmy dates that appear in user-signs on wiki too.

Now here, I am messaging in support of no one, so please don't think that I supported non-RS on this page. As I said, when I edited the page, it was last revised by Saqib, so maybe there wouldn't be any bad source. If the page's current condition is quite similar to that revision, can I edit again? Please clarify, Thanks! M. Billoo 01:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@M.Billoo2000: Sure go ahead and fix the page. I have removed the unreliable sources and I suggest you to add this BLP in your watchlist. --Saqib (talk) 09:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib: Hi! Thanks for your kind response. I had already seen your messages, though I couldn't be able to respond. I am not available for some days, thought I wished today to see what's going on here. Thanks! M. Billoo 11:06, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]