Talk:Gerrit (software)

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Mid-importance).

[untitled]

Would it be possible to find a more authoritative and english reference for the ACL-patch-fork story? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.75.167.238 (talk) 13:02, 19 September 2010‎ (UTC)[reply]

I found one and replaced the other reference JnRouvignac (talk) 06:56, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[untitled]

The description is quite uninformative for someone not familiar with the topic. Talking about the "X started as a set of patches for Y..." part. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.32.98.169 (talk) 02:15, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The German article on Gerrit is much better in that regard. You should add a translation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.130.126.87 (talk) 13:30, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a verbatim copy/paste from the product's About page... https://www.gerritcodereview.com/about.md 66.129.241.11 (talk) 20:33, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this article should give more information like how it differs from other code review software and such. The history part is also very difficult to read. --HiddenKnowledge (talk) 13:34, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gerrit (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:56, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gerrit (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140421234730/http://www.cyanogenmod.org/community to http://www.cyanogenmod.org/community
Corrected formatting/usage for http://dj.riceweevil.com/2010/07/25-week/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gitosis and Gitolite?

The section on gitosis and gitolite is either not clear on its relationship to Gerrit, or doesn't belong here at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.229.58 (talk) 23:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Java rewrite rationale

From article: The rewrite changed the implementation from Python on Google App Engine to Java on a J2EE servlet container and a SQL database, making it easier to run Gerrit Code Review on any Linux system. Without citations. The last part "making it easier to run ..." is very subjective. I would say Python is much easier to run than Java on almost any Linux distro, so I doubt this was the actual reason for the rewrite. My guess is that most of the Android is in Java or C, and Go didn't really existed (or has no good app and web framework available yet, or popular one) as such yet, Java was selected possibly for speed, familiarity, or some other reasons (i.e. afaik Gerrit uses GWT which provides a lot of frontend automation and code generation).81.6.34.246 (talk) 06:20, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]