Talk:Geovisualization

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Maps

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Systems High‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Visualization.

It is requested that a diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images.

where is the visualization for this article???

Does anyone else find it ironic, and a little sad, that the "Geovisualization" article has no.... visualizations! Come on wikipedians, let's fix this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.184.156 (talk) 13:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

link to Makai Voyager

I'd like to add a link to Makai Voyager; but it was removed as spam. As with the Avizo and GeoViz links, the Voyager software is a software product aimed at geovisualization. Neither of those products/software are referenced in the text of the article. I'd be happy to contribute an image per the comment above ('where is the *visualization* for this article???'). — Preceding unsigned comment added by John carl anderson (talk • contribs) 07:51, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As an employee of the company it is a conflict of interest to add links to it on Wikipedia. If the software is notable then leave it to somebody else to add it to the article. --Biker Biker (talk) 08:08, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that the link to Avizo's product was added by this user (http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Special:Contributions/Egallois), it doesn't seem like the COI policy is being applied evenly to existing and new contributions. I don't want the Avizo's link removed, however, because I think it's valuable to be able to see the commercial interests in a field; I just wanted to add a few links to show that they are not the *only* commercial interests. Anyhow, as I said before, I'd be happy to contribute a few images to this page if it wouldn't just get removed immediately...John carl anderson (talk) 17:23, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geovisualization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]