Talk:George Rolph
George Rolph has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 19, 2025. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on George Rolph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929105541/http://www.ourroots.ca/e/toc.aspx?id=3027 to http://www.ourroots.ca/e/toc.aspx?id=3027
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on George Rolph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926215922/http://www.ourroots.ca/e/toc.aspx?id=8548 to http://www.ourroots.ca/e/toc.aspx?id=8548
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:George Rolph/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Z1720 (talk · contribs) 19:09, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: EF5 (talk · contribs) 14:06, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I'll be reviewing this shortly! :) EF5 14:06, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- @EF5: Reminder ping. Z1720 (talk) 04:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I had a relatively severe case of the flu. I'll get to it today. :) EF5 13:19, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
The table:
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Because every source is one I can't access, I have to AGF on plagiarism and verifiability, but it seems legitimate.
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Talks about his life (albeit relatively briefly) and his political career, so I see no major issues.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Isn't promotional in tone nor does the article use weasel words.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No recent edit wars.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- There is one image, and it seems to be licensed properly.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Good job! Usually I have things to point out, but I really see nothing that needs fixed. :) EF5 20:40, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
Did you know nomination
[edit]
- ... that while George Rolph (pictured) sued six of his assailants in the Ancaster incident for ₤1000 each, the trial only awarded him ₤20 from two of the assailants?
- Source: Petty, Ross (2022). "The 1826 Ancaster Tar and Feathers Outrage: Three Defendants' Perspectives"
- ALT1: ... that in the Ancaster incident, a mob composed of the Family Compact attacked George Rolph (pictured) for allegedly having an affair? Source: Multiple
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sarah Pike Conger
- Comment: Second qpq: Template:Did you know nominations/Gilbert Eastman. Ancaster Incident was an article creation.
Z1720 (talk) 02:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC). Both articles:
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Epicgenius (talk) 14:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (military) articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- GA-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- GA-Class Ontario articles
- Low-importance Ontario articles
- GA-Class Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
- Low-importance Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class Canadian military history articles
- Canadian military history task force articles
- GA-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Articles that have been nominated for Did you know