Talk:Geologist

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Geologist article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Geology Top‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Geologist is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mining Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupations (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations articles

yeuwehfiuw

After the 'Beer' section was wiped out today by an unregistered user, I'd like to get some thoughts on the validity of the section. Keep it, different page, or dump it all together?--Qfl247 (talk) 01:29, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest leaving it out. I've been a professional geologist for a long time and am a bit tired of the cliché of geologists and beer. Sure there's a "close relationship", but I'd rather not enshrine it in Wikipedia. I already have plenty of geology students who feel an obligation to drink lots of beer! Wilson44691 (talk) 01:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any real problem with having something about geologists & beer, but this new section is distinctly unencyclopedic. Clean up & make NPOV, if we keep it. Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 05:08, 13 January 2010 (UTC), another geologist (who likes beer)[reply]

I agree with Wiطlson44691, it is have "close relationship", especially when we are going to the field, but it is unencyclopedic. Cheers (some cups of beer).--Tranletuhan (talk) 03:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photo won't load?

Another editor removed this image, commenting that it wouldn't load. It comes up for me, so I'm putting it here to see if it loads for others. TIA, Pete Tillman (talk) 19:42, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't see it, but after adding 250px to the image text I find that I can. I wonder if that works for others. Mikenorton (talk) 20:14, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geologist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160303225940/http://www.amnh.org/education/resources/rfl/web/essaybooks/earth/p_hutton.html to http://www.amnh.org/education/resources/rfl/web/essaybooks/earth/p_hutton.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)نميعإب[reply]