Talk:Geographic information science

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geography High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Maps Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

incorrect capitalisation

I changed the capitalisation of the lemma (and of geographic information system) to correspond to other sciences (and general spelling rules for common/proper nouns). It wouldn't be correct to capitalise "physics" or "theory of relativity" either. BTW, it's confusing for non-experts that according to the name it's a science, but the article calls it a theory. --Espoo 12:59, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information

Good start. In addition, consider adding link(s) and/or various addedums related to information science (IS) - moreover, research topics w/in IS that the existing entry for Geographic Information Science loosely touches on already; for example:

relevance / precicion vs. recall / information seeking behavior / cognitive modeling of the user / information visualization

Just brainstorming, but those can all be applied to this entry in some meaningful fashion. Thanks, and keep up the good work!

Distinction without a difference

I'm afraid that GeoComputation is not really different, but a different definition of Geographic Information Systems. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.0.130.100 (talk) 21:50, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't agree from my very limited knowledge. GeoComputation may or may not involve a GIS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.150.108.37 (talk) 11:28, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Answer and proposition. The most commonly and widely accepted term of Geomatics should cover both Geoinformatics and Geocomputation, and probably Geographic information science. A merge of all those articles, which are not very dense anyway, could reasonably be a common ground for the four names. Slight differences could be mentioned in a special paragraphs (I'll think about a version of it). All the folks in these domains are meeting in the same conferences! The fact that -as the above anonymous- GIS are or not involved, doesnt matter to the underlying science and tech. But GIS should keep their own entry in the encyclopedia, as a technology used in Geomatics. Moreover, the status of Geomatics engineering seems unclear, as it is a mere list of the technologies used in Geomatics. It could become a section of the new article. Jeansoulin (talk) 14:27, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]