Talk:Gaius Pontius

A fact from Gaius Pontius appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 May 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Gaius Pontius, the Samnite general and victor at the Battle of the Caudine Forks, is believed to be an ancestor of the Roman governor of Judea Pontius Pilate?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/May.

Wikipedia

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / Classical Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The first name of Pontius?

I was reading Machiavelli's Discourses on Livy, specifically the most recent translation by Mansfield and Tarcov, and in Book III 12.2, Machiavelli refers to "Claudius Pontius." Claudius was a Samnite, and Machiavelli quotes a line from his speech in Livy XI 1. This Samnite general, after having given this speech, goes on, as Livy indicates, to defeat the Romans at the battle of the Caudine Forks. Now, in this article, he is referred to as "Gaius" Pontius. So, using Perseus, which is the only thing I had available, I went to look at the Latin itself to see what the name was. As Livy does, he only gives the first initial. In the text, he says, in every edition I saw on Perseus "C. Pontius." Now, I have not taken Latin in a number of years, but I think an initial with "C" should not turn out to be "Gaius (if I am wrong there, correct me).

It is also the case, though, that the name Claudius doesn't seem to be given either. In the English translations I found, which are admittedly all old, the name is similarly not translated the same throughout. The earlier of the two translations have, in order, "C. Pontius," and then "Caius Pontius." The most recent available (1926...so not too recent), does in fact say "Gaius Pontius." Another english translation I found, from 1823, also used "Caius Pontius."

Now, I really have no clue what to think here. I am inclined to think that the combination of a) the letter "C" in the Latin translations, the authority of Machiavelli, and of Mansfield and Tarcov, are sufficient to tilt the balance toward Claudius. But I really do not know. Of course, this is not a big deal, considering the guy is of little importance. But, it seems like the matter is not clear. This is especially the case because the article itself gives no specific citations to any texts. I am not confident enough to be willing to change it, so I will leave this comment instead. 2601:19B:0:9EB0:91E3:50D9:92DA:EA5E (talk) 21:36, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]