Talk:Gabor wavelet

"Improved" Gabor Wavelet?

The addition of the section "Improved Gabor Wavelet" talks about an article from 2015 that seems to have no citations as of today. I think that it is quite debatable whether there is an actual improvement there, and also the formulas there look incorrect (there are a couple of $*$ that seem out of place at least).

I do think that this section should be removed from the article. jbc (talk) 12:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Formulas are incorrect and the section is poorly written. The main idea is that the wavelet in the form exp(-pi t^2 / a^2) exp(-2 pi i f t) is "better" than in the form exp(-t^2 / a^2) exp(-i omega t) in a similar way as some would argue that the Fourier transform is "better" in the form exp(-i 2 pi f t) than in the form exp(-i omega t). That is no invalid point by itself, but would only add a benefit to the page if it would be well written (and use correct mathematical notation). I removed it, don't know if it get's aproved. 77.181.103.239 (talk) 15:52, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]