Talk:Gabor transform

Does someone have the proof for inversion formula ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.100.8.99 (talk) 14:07, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am puzzled by the fact that the length of the window function does not appear in the definition of the Gabor transform. Without this, how do you adjust the time/frequency resolution? Mizar1234 (talk) 21:28, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to me that the equation for the inverse transform does not recover the original function but rather the enveloped version of the original. Dstahlke (talk) 00:37, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

I propose that this page be merged with the FBI transform; see the discussion on that talk page. If you have any comments or opinions please leave them there, not here, so the discussion is kept together. Quietbritishjim (talk) 14:57, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

'Wrong' Formula for 'Discrete Gabor-Transformation'

For me, the formula stated as 'Discrete Gabor-Transformation' is confusing.
What I expect to see here is the formula for the Gabor transformation, but $y(k)=...$ is the formula for the discrete inverse transformation aka Gabor expansion.
I would rather like to see something beginning with $C_{M,N}=...$ .
(Reference: Shie Qian and Dapang Chen: "Discrete Gabor Transform", IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 41, No. 7, July 1993, pp 2429-2438)134.100.5.65 (talk) 21:46, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]