Talk:GCR Class 2
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Photographic evidence, etc.
[edit]I've removed the following because it's entirely unsourced and reads like WP:OR/commentary/personal opinion.
- Photographic evidence exists of GCR 565 having been retro-fitted with coil springs on the crank axle (but not the trailing axle).
- Yeadon described 561 (the prototype) as being the only one built with tapered buffer housings, this is incorrect. There is a photo of 567 in MSLR livery that definitely has tapered housing buffers, as does the photo of 565 in GCR livery. The line engraving of 687 in MSLR livery (alongside) also shows the tapered housings
- A photo of 5706 in LNER days shows that it (and by then, all of the class) had been fitted with group standard buffers - probably because the springs in the earlier design tended to break...
--Redrose64 (talk) 12:36, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on GCR Class 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131228045322/http://www.gcr-rollingstocktrust.co.uk/news_output.asp?id=227 to http://www.gcr-rollingstocktrust.co.uk/news_output.asp?id=227
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)