Talk:G. L. S. Shackle

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Economics

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://homepage.newschool.edu/het/profiles/shackle.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 03:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"he has been described as drawing "Keynesian conclusions from Austrian premises.""

It seems to me that this is an extremely contentious interpretation of Shackle's work. The only area of Austrian theory that remotely interested Shackle was Bohm-Bawerk's capital theory. Apart from that Shackle's work was wholly and consciously derived from Keynes. This is particularly shown in the fact that he rejects the time preference theory of the interest rate and thus, implicitly, the idea of a "natural rate of interest" and instead endorses Keynes' liquidity preference theory of the interest rate.

I note that the quote that Shackle supposedly arrived at "Keynesian conclusions from Austrian premises" is not cited. Can we get a citation on this and make clear that this is a contentious view? Otherwise I think this passage should be removed.

O5o7 (talk) 16:01, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on G. L. S. Shackle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090223155653/http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/profiles/shackle.htm to http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/profiles/shackle.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:58, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"High Theory" in economics

I read the term "high theory" in something I'd Googled up, and having survived 72 years without taking note of it, searched for it w/ G-search & the other obvious Web tool, finding nothing as tantalizing as GLSS's use of it, IIRC in an opening-chapter's title. (Google his name and "high theory".) 'He', it seems, found it transparently clear, and I think I've established that, for me, it is not. Thots?
--

 Jerzy•t 08:05, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]