This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montreal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montreal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontrealWikipedia:WikiProject MontrealTemplate:WikiProject MontrealMontreal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
No corruption scandal section? Srsly? Not even a single word "corruption" in the entire article on Gerry Tremblay?
And why such crappy official photo?
i checked the same thing just now, seems like simply nobody has included it yet because i see nothing about it in the history. i might do it over the weekend. guess nobody on wikipedia cares about the biggest corruption scandal in quebec/canadian history.24.139.14.254 (talk) 03:10, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just a warning that under WP:BLP, we need to be extremely careful not to editorialize, or to overstep the bounds of what can be properly attributed to reliable sources. By and large, the only credible allegation that's been made against Tremblay himself in the matter is that he was (willfully or otherwise) blind to corruption issues taking place under him -- there has been no credible allegation made to date that he actually had direct involvement in any of it. Anything that extends into editorializing, or that makes improperly sourced assertions about his involvement in the scandal, will be removed from the article again. Bearcat (talk) 19:26, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
