Talk:French Constitution of 1791

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The French constitution was drafted by Michel Debre. Charles De Gaulle was the thinking part of the constitution 65.6.158.205 (talk) 23:30, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

300 people to the guillotine

I removed this sentence, at the end of "Early Efforts":

The Committee, which was ideologically divided, ended up sending over 300 people to the guillotine.

I'm pretty sure that the Monarchien Constitutional Committee didn't have the authority to sentence anyone to death; and the guillotine wasn't even invented yet. If I had to guess, I'd think that maybe the point was that the National Assembly or the National Constituent Assembly were divided? And maybe that some large number of them were eventually executed? If someone can explain this, please feel free to add this sentence back in; I found it really confusing. --ESP (talk) 20:24, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What did the Constitution actually say?

This entry does not have any section summarizing the content of the 1791 constitution! 128.148.231.34 (talk) 19:40, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should we distinguish primary and secondary electors?

Luisa Fernanda Garcia Lopez, in an essay on Sieyes in *The Foundations and Traditions of Constitutional Amendment,* says primary electors had only to be 21 and secondary electors 25 -- and "to swear to uphold freedom and equality" (p.126). Jjdavenport99 (talk) 00:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]