Talk:Franz Sieber

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia

	Australia portal Franz Sieber is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Inline templates

@Rkitko - You and Hesperian voted for the deletion of botanist-inline2 and now are in the process of deleting botanist-inline. This means that you have made it impossible to include a template in the text. Now it belatedly occurs to you that an inline piece of text detailing the author abbreviation will not automatically generate the category which you feel is necessary - well, now the category will have to be added manually. Rotational (talk) 17:29, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, it didn't belatedly occur to me; I've known the template transcludes a category with the rest of the wording. And no, it's not impossible to include a template in the text. {{botanist}} still exists. Also, to clarify, I am not "in the process of deleting {{botanist-inline}}" - I haven't even published my support for the deletion at the discussion. I do believe that the use of the inline botanist template didn't have enough discussion before implementation. If you believe {{botanist}} is inferior, propose changes rather than attempting to circumvent discussion by creating templates which have no consensus for use. Personally, I still prefer the botanist template as is, though I might be open to a well-reasoned argument for why the template should be dropped in favor of including the information in the lead. It's still unclear what many other botany folks think regarding that. --Rkitko ^(talk) 13:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course {{botanist}} exists. The problem is that it would look damned queer used inline. I made that quite clear in my objection to the deleting of the inline versions. Rotational (talk) 20:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

now the category will have to be added manually. Yeah. So what? Hesperian 23:16, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]