Talk:Francis Rooney/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Francis Rooney. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
official picture change
 | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
The current photo being used for Francis Rooney is not the official portrait of him The current source of the image appears to link to a non existent link. [1]
The official portrait http://francisrooney.house.gov/media/press-kit.htm is linked here [2]
Nick1776 (talk) 03:16, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- The picture was changed by MB298. Altamel (talk) 02:31, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Francis Rooney official congressional photo.jpg". Wikipedia.
- ^ "official portrait". Francis Rooney House Website.
Official Congressional Photo Update
 | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. A reviewer felt that this edit would not improve the article. |
The photo currently being used is not his official photograph, there is no source for this photo. It was edited through a mobile edit.
The photo of Francis Rooney should be switched to this photo http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Francis_Rooney_Official_Congressional_Photo.png
References for Francis Rooney's official Congressional photo can be found on the Congressman's official Website and verified Facebook Page:
https://francisrooney.house.gov/media/press-kit.htmCite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).
https://www.facebook.com/RepRooney/Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).
Nick1776 (talk) 14:21, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- No source for the photo is needed. Seeing as the current photo is the one used at various different language Wikipedias, I'd prefer to keep it that way instead of replacing it with a very similar one. The only biographical image guideline that I could find states that images "should not be used out of context to present a person in a false or disparaging light", which the current photo does not. Edit request declined. Regards, VB00 (talk) 13:07, 16 July 2017 (UTC)