Talk:François Quesnay

This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Philosophy: Philosophers / Social and political / Modern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Social and political philosophy
	Modern philosophy

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

There is a great quotation by Quesnay in chapter ten of Das Kapital: "...ihr gibt zu, dass je mehr man, ohne Nachteil fuer die Produktioni, Kosten oder kostspielige Arbeiten in der Fabrikanten industrieller Produkte ersparen kann, desto vorteilhafter diese Ersparung, weil sie den Preis des Machwerks vermindert. Und trotzdem glaubt ihr, dass die Produktion des Reichtums, der aus den Arbeiten der Industriellen herkommet, in der Vermehrung des Tauschwerts ihres Machwerks besteht [Dialoge ueber den Handel und die industrielle Arbeit]." Who was Quesnay responding to? Can we have some more information on the substantive character of the debates he was engaged in? What is the history of Q's reception from his day to Smith to Marx? Can we answer these questions without overly depending on descriptions of a "Physiocratic school"?

Here is the answer: Marx used the edition of Eugèn Daire: Physiocrates: Quesnay, Dupont de Nemours, Mercier de la Rivière, Paris 1846. In an introductory note Dupont de Nemours explains that the «Dialogues» over commerce and artisans reflect discussions between Quesnay as M. H. and Nicaque and de l´Isle as M. N. in the Journaux de l´agriculture.

But the arguments cannot be understood without unlearning modern economics. In classical economics only land (=nature) is an “original” factor (with decreasing returns as Ricardo was to explain later). Labour and capital are reproducible factors (with increasing returns because of the division of labour as A. Smith was to explain later). And what is reproducible will be reproduced under competitive conditions until any margin has vanished. So, no marginal returns for labour and capital in the long run. Land is scarce because it is not reproducible; is it a sort of monopoly. So in the long run only land will have a margin.

Neoclassical economics is static with “steady state” development as its most advanced feature. “Steady” stands for static: no changes in proportions. An a static theory cannot interprete what “reproducibl” means. Bold text —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.225.66.231 (talk) 13:08, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-paste registration

In this edit text is copy/pasted from Tableau économique. -- Mdd (talk) 00:39, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]