Jump to content

Talk:Forever Evil

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Forever Evil

[edit]

I was wondering if I could get some other user's opinions. What are everyone's thought on what to do with Forever Evil? I was planning on trying to keep it on this page, (and am in the process of getting a teaser plot up on the page), but wanted to know if it should be made into its own page? Just considering, if we will attempt to add a plot for the Villains Month titles, then the four main book, and the tie-ins as well, that may be pretty large. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:41, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should keep it all in this page, as much as possible. Much like other line-wide crossovers (Infinite Crisis, Final Crisis) generally were kept in one article, aside for the lead-up stuff like 52/Countdown) Villains Month might be a bit different because of the various vilain titles; those can probably be summarized in a sentence or two each, ("In Bizarro #1, the creation of Bizarro is told, a clone of Superman by Lex Luthor, etc") and if the villain has an article the plot could be expanded there. I'd think there should only be a real plot explanation if it's relevant to Forever Evil - which is the core of the event - and repercussions to the DCU. If the article becomes too large when we're deeper into the event, it might be more worth splitting off. I kind of had an internal debate after this article was created, about whether it should be titled "Forever Evil" or Villains Month - but it didn't really matter much at that point. Might be different now. || Tako (bother me) || 18:12, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I agree with what you are saying - I had similar thought and feeling. And I do agree with you on your thoughts on the title of the article. Maybe that should be another discussion. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:20, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Dude, would you mind much if I went over the synopsis of the storylines and condensed them? I mean, they're real thorough and indepth at the moment, which is good and all, but it's kinda looking like big walls of text. Are you happy with me to tighten them down a bit to a bit more of a bare-bones synopsis? I don't want to step on your toes or anything, so I wanted to ask first. Justin.Parallax (talk) 17:47, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Go for it! I was going to make that a task once everything was done, but now is perfectly fine. If you'd like too, Trinity War needs condensing as well. Thanks! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:06, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Villains Month reviews

[edit]

Going to add the individual reviews for the books that I can find from IGN, Newsarama and CBR here. At the end of the month, a general reception for the event should be written, and highlight stand out issues, good and bad. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:11, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hit or miss with the Newsarama reviews. Usually in an article titled "Best Shots".
Week 1
CBR
# out of 5 stars 		IGN
#.# out of 10 		Newsarama
# out of 10
Issue Rating
Cyborg Superman 2 7.3
Joker 1.5 9
Editor's Choice 		9
Two-Face 2.5 8.1
Ventriloquist 3.5 6.5 10
Poison Ivy 1.5 6.8 6
Desaad 1.5 8.7
Editor's Choice
Grodd 3.5 8.5
Editor's Choice
Count Vertigo 4 8.3 8
Relic 2.5 7.0 5
Darkseid 3.5 7.0
The Creeper 0.5 4.0
Deadshot 3.5 7.6 8
Bizarro 2.5 6.5 9
Week 2
Zod 1 9.5 6
Black Manta 3 8.0 8
The Riddler 4 9.4 8
Court of Owls 2.5 8.9
Editor's Choice
Mr. Freeze 2 7.0
Harley Quinn 2.5 5.9 7
Solomon Grundy 1.5 6.5
Reverse Flash 3.5 7.9 7
Mongul 6.5
Lobo 3.5 7.2 7
Killer Frost 3.5 7.5
Brainiac 2.5 9.0
Trigon 0
(yes 0) 		7.4
Week 3
CBR
# out of 5 stars 		IGN
#.# out of 10 		Newsarama
# out of 10
Issue Rating
Lex Luthor 2.5 7.8 7
The Penguin 1.5 7.6 7
Ra's al Ghul 3.5 6.5
Clayface 1.5 6.9
Scarecrow 2 5
The Rogues 3.5 8.4
Black Hand 4 6.9 6
Dial E 2 6.0
Shadow Thief 3.5 5.2
Eclipso 0.5 6.2
H'El 3.5
Arcane 4 9.7
Editor's Choice 		9
Deathstroke 4.6
The Cheetah 4 9.4
Week 4
Metallo 8.0
Ocean Master 2.5 6.8
Bane 6.0 8
Killer Croc 7.0
Doomsday 7.1
Joker's Daughter 1 2 2
Man-Bat 3.5 7.8 9
Sinestro 1.5 6.2 7
Secret Society 2.5 7.3 4
Black Adam 3 7.5
Parasite 3 9.3 8
First Born 4 7.8

What does the indicia for the titles call the books?

[edit]

Any body know what the indicia for the titles calls the books? (The indicia is usually on the last page or backcover where they have a column of sorts.) Is it just, for example, "Detective Comics #23.1" - or "Detective Comics #23.1 - Poison Ivy #1"? or is it like on Comixology, "Detective Comics (2011-) #23.1: Featuring Poison Ivy" || Tako (bother me) || 13:16, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Scarecrow's states "DETECTIVE COMICS (ISBN ###..) 23.3" Hope that helps. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:18, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's...kinda lame. I'd have thought they'd dual title & number it. || Tako (bother me) || 18:16, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Forever Evil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:06, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Forever Evil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:19, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Forever Evil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:Forever_Evil&oldid=1199881496"