Talk:Forests of Australia
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | This article was selected as the article for improvement on 12 May 2014 for a period of one week. |
Significant
[edit]By what criteria? this could be a significantly misleading list unless further qualification is made - considering the level of science in the RFA's for each state - this list is potentially a trainwreck unless further criteria are addressed please - SatuSuro 02:44, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, criteria and descriptions needs to be added, along with references and topic sections. This is a starting point for the article - more details and information to follow. Each article in the list contains information on its significant forest(s). Peter Campbell 07:10, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- arrgghhh please make sure whenever you say significant forests please realise there is a potential issue in a whole range of contexts - qualifying why and how should be an important aim in such work - cheers SatuSuro 07:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'd be even more pesky and say maybe at least 2 or 3 qulifiers in the table if possible - maybe not now but a possible future addition SatuSuro 13:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
More content about forest coverage, trends and data across Australia
[edit]This article will be expanded to include more specific information about forest coverage, trends and data across Australia under additional headings. Feel free to add this type of information now if you have time. Peter Campbell 22:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
To include?
[edit]How about the two ecoregions, Queensland tropical rain forests and Eastern Australian temperate forests, should they be included? - Shiftchange (talk) 11:09, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Shiftchange: That would be a welcome addition. I would encourage you to add those in there. --NickPenguin(contribs) 16:12, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Forests of Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604211106/http://www.daff.gov.au/brs/publications/series/forest-profiles to http://www.daff.gov.au/brs/publications/series/forest-profiles
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC)