This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Florence Merriam Bailey is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is related to the Smithsonian Institution Archives. Learn more about this collaborative project to document the history of the world's largest museum complex, and how you can get involved, here.Smithsonian Institution ArchivesWikipedia:GLAM/SIATemplate:WikiProject Smithsonian Institution ArchivesSmithsonian Institution Archives-related articles
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Green project in 2022. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in GreenWikipedia:WikiProject Women in GreenTemplate:WikiProject Women in GreenWomen in Green articles
Normally we do not remove tags for sources unless sources have been added. And per the edit summary, not quite. External links are external links and do not count as sources, see WP:CITE for further details on how to properly reference material/sources (see external links section specifically). If external links are used as references then they need to be moved to that area. Thank you. Aboutmovies20:06, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Oehser obituary cited appears to be the source of the external link. It is cited here and nearly every paragraph here can be found in the obit. It would be better to tag any doubtful statements here with citation needed tags.Shyamal01:29, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Kofalk identifies Locust Grove as the homestead of FAMB's grandparents, and that it is near Leyden, New York. She was born on the Homewood estate that her father built near Locust Grove. It's not clear that Locust Grove was ever an identifiable place, and hence whether it should be given as FAMB's birthplace. I'm inclined to change it to Leyden, but I will consult additional sources.Dgorsline (talk) 17:52, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I find it odd that FAMB is listed as an author collected in Cracroft and Lambert's A Believing People. There is no mention of Mormonism, indeed of any participation in organized religion, on the the part of FAMB in Kolfalk's biography. Dgorsline (talk) 21:41, 29 December 2013 (UTC) Aha, I overlooked her My Summer in a Mormon Village. Dgorsline (talk) 17:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The article was tagged with onesource. The article primarily relies on Harriet Kofalk's monograph biography, No Woman Tenderfoot: Florence Merriam Bailey, Pioneer Naturalist, but it also incorporates material from contemporary obituaries and other sources. I doubt that most editors would fault Kofalk for verifiability or neutrality. I suggest removing the onesource tag. Dgorsline (talk) 12:20, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think the lead needs to be reworked. It feels too granular on a few topics and doesn't really summarize the article very well, other than the first paragraph, which drew my interest immediately. SquareInARoundHole (talk) 07:01, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
SquareInARoundHole I have been attempting to rewrite the lede for the better part of an hour and have no idea how to substantially rework it without more specific advice. The major aspects of the article are all covered: early life, college, writing, later life, death. Please don't mean this as an insult or me trying to be difficult, it's just that every attempted rewrite I do just ends up covering the same thing in slightly different words. Is this your only comment? The article has been left "on review" for several weeks without so much as a ping. — GhostRiver18:38, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think the rest of the article is good, but it is quite long and I've been sick and I'm currently working two jobs so have had little time to verify all of the sources, but continue to do so over time. I suspect they will all check out and my only concern with passing this article is the lede.
My issue with it is that while it does summarize the parts of the article as you've stated, it feels oddly focused on her companions, and doesn't really capture why she's notable. I understand mentioning her father and brother, for example, but not the nature walks or even the trip she took with them. Instead, mentioning that she had little formal education in her early life and instead was educated and influenced by her family, especially her brother who was a notable zoologist makes sense. The same for her place of birth. It's a granular detail that while true, does not tell me anything about why/how she's notable. A better point would be to tie into her home science education near the Adirondack Mountains, which had ample nature, especially birds. Both of those points could be tied into a single sentence in the second paragraph. Her time in college is mentioned, but her status as a special student who wasn't eligible for a degree is not, and it's important because her legacy caused the college to present her with a degree in her 50's.
It doesn't at all capture her legacy - no awards, no summary of her works (how many books did she write?), nothing about her teaching, no laws her activism affected, not even the bird species named after her. These are the things I would expect to see in a lede about this woman, summarizing this very good article about her life and notability. I hope this is more helpful. SquareInARoundHole (talk) 16:29, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@GhostRiver: I finished checking the citations and everything passed. Let me know if you want to rework the lede any further. Happy to update the article to GA status if you're happy with the lede. SquareInARoundHole (talk) 14:24, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
