Talk:Flexure bearing
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Flexure Disambiguation, Related Articles
[edit]- OptoMechEngineer (talk) 13 Feb 2017 - 7 Years later, I felt bold and implemented my own suggested changes. I think things are a little clearer now. Main changes are:
- New disambiguation page: Flexure (disambiguation)
- Flexure page is now an intro to flexure design as an engineering topic, with some examples. I will need to fill it in with more material but its a start.
- Flexure bearing is largely the same, although the article has been re-worded at the start to be more consistent with the Flexure page. Basically, Flexure Bearings are a category of Flexures, so that's how it's worded. I'll try to re-word this article to be a little more in-line with Wikipedia format guidelines.
General Article Notes
[edit]- Added link to tic-tac box image and removed reqdiagram tag. Egmason (talk) 22:55, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- I added a citation to https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214785320394852?via%3Dihub for the sentence about flexture bearings being easy to repair. The assertion surprised me since, as far as I can understand, they're usually a single piece of material built into the original, making a repair difficult. I still don't understand why they're considered easy to repair, but at least I found a paper making that claim (which, it turned out, exactly the same wording as was here in the article!) Ericpw (talk) 05:18, 10 January 2025 (UTC)