Jump to content

Talk:Field Army (United Kingdom)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How to do the move?

[edit]
- I missed any discussion on the page move to Field Army (United Kingdom) but, even if editors support this, the page move should be done properly rather than by cut and paste: otherwise we lose the edit history. Dormskirk (talk) 08:50, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

[edit]

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Defence Fire Risk Management Organisation

[edit]

The website of the Defence Fire Training and Development Centre says that in 2007 the Army took over responsibility for all MoD firefighting and thus DFTDC came under the aegis of HQ LAND via the Defence Fire Risk Management Organisation (DFRMO), having previously been part of the RAF. It's not my speciality but I'm guessing there may be other oddments like that which are not currently included in the article? Le Deluge (talk) 12:52, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. This article currently only scratches the surface. Buckshot06 (talk) 06:24, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Army Reorganisation

[edit]

Under a major army command reorganisation effective 1 November 2011 the Chief of the General Staff took direct command of the Army through a new structure known as "Army Headquarters". See [1]. I therefore propose moving this article to "Army Headquarters (United Kingdom)". We can then use "Army Headquarters" as a disambiguation page as several countries use the terminology "Army Headquarters". I hope everyone is Ok with this. Dormskirk (talk) 20:49, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not. This is a page for all the single land force commands since 1972. Army Headquarters is just that. This page should actually have been left at Land Command, because HQ LF is not a command, it's some sort of in-between thing. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:04, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually looking at the link, this page should be reconfigured as 'Commander Land Force', the new three-star post. That's the linear succeesor. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:07, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Commander Land Forces" is a possibility but as I understand it the substance of the move is that the Chief of the General Staff has absorbed the role of Commander-in-Chief. So it is the CGS who is the Commander and he has chosen the title "Army Headquarters" See [2]. I don't think the Commander Land Forces will actually be the decision maker. Also note that the Adjutant-General and Commander Development and Training (who did report to the Commander-in-Chief) will now report direct to the CGS so I think the CGS is now the linear successor. Dormskirk (talk) 21:36, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This page is about the command of the field formations of the army in the UK since 1972. Commander Land Forces is now a post, rather than having a command attached to him, but is the linear successor to StratCom, UKLF, Land Command, and HQ LF. Thus I believe we should rename the page Commander Land Forces. Alternately we should leave this page at HQ LF, as there is no command anymore, and simply create a new appoinment page for CLF. Buckshot06 (talk) 09:00, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think you make a fair point and I now agree that "Commander Land Forces" is the best choice. I will move the article if there are no further objections. Dormskirk (talk) 22:03, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Commander Field Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Commander Field Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Commander Field Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:33, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Next Commander

[edit]

Lieutenant General Ivan B.L Jones, suceeding Patrick Sanders shortly.

http://www.gulabin.com/armynavy/pdf/Army%20Commands%201860-.pdf

BlueD954 (talk) 05:38, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Dormskirk (talk) 07:39, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Latest British Army Field Army restructure

[edit]

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/army-restructures-to-confront-evolving-threats

BlueD954 (talk) 12:58, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

British Army/Forces Germany

[edit]

Not under CFA.

BlueD954 (talk) 08:21, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Give a reference

[edit]

Smarty, give your reference 1st Armoured Brigade will be a Strike BCT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BlueD954 (talk) 15:22, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Name?

[edit]

Hi @Dormskirk, shouldn't this page be called "Land Command (British Army)" instead of just "Land Command", there are several Land Commands out there in the world. And possibly a disambig page? Coldstreamer20 (talk) 18:19, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would support that but please seek to the support of other editors first. By the way I think you have put the question on the wrong page (it should be at Talk:Land Command). Dormskirk (talk) 18:31, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:56, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:21, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:Field_Army_(United_Kingdom)&oldid=1207218321"