Talk:Executive Order 14172

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Presidents

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents.

United States Presidents: Donald Trump

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States Presidents, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of United States Presidents on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States PresidentsWikipedia:WikiProject Presidents of the United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United States PresidentsUnited States Presidents
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Donald Trump task force.

Politics: American

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Geography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Why

Why is this its own article? ChrisletWiki (talk) 01:20, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisletWiki: Most executive orders have their own articles. Most don't have as much to say, though. Minh Nguyễn ^💬 04:33, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So then, by having lots to say on this one, perhaps it’s being used as propaganda, instead of information. ChrisletWiki (talk) 09:22, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Naming convention

What is the standard for geographic place names in the article? Sometimes it uses "Quotations" and other time italics. It would be helpful if we could reach a consensus. Cheers, CF-501 Falcon (talk) 23:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure italics are inappropriate. See MOS:ITALIC, MOS:NOITAL, and MOS:ITAL. GA-RT-22 (talk) 19:58, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GA-RT-22, Thank you. I was pretty sure to not use Italics just making sure. CF-501 Falcon (talk) 20:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It could possibly fit under MOS:WORDSASWORDS but my opinion is that it does not. GA-RT-22 (talk) 22:38, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with you. I don't think MOS:WAW applies. CF-501 Falcon (talk) 01:57, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]