Jump to content

Talk:Ethel Mannin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ethel Mannin/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Someone - presumably Jude Chelliah herself - included the following trite, foolish and inappropriate comment : "Her most devoted admirer & collector is Jude Chelliah who would love to track down her descendents. Use this space, perhaps ?"Mike M SA (talk) 19:57, 25 October 2008 (UTC)Mike_MSA[reply]

Last edited at 19:57, 25 October 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ethel Mannin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:49, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessment needed?

[edit]

She seems to have been very successful with her novels from the mid Twenties but this isn’t mentioned by Wikipedia and most biogs focus on her politics. She earned quote a bit of income from her novels (were they quite racy?!) and seems to have been living the high life in the Twenties, believing in free love etc. so there are revisions needed on Wikipedia. And probably also the literary critique of her novels needs to be updated! Szczels (talk) 16:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]