Jump to content

Talk:Esperanza (Enrique Iglesias song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Esperanza (Enrique Iglesias song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notimex

[edit]

Is Notimex at Weekly charts the right link? As far as I know, Notimex is not a record charts provider. (CC) Tbhotch 04:31, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tbhotch: From what I gather, they used to publish charts in the 90s, but haven't done so since then. At the very least, the charts were provided to them and they published it. Erick (talk) 14:22, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Esperanza (Enrique Iglesias song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nkon21 (talk · contribs) 03:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. This shouldn't take too much time given the article's length. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 03:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Is this the European or US single cover? It should be labeled in the caption
I'm assuming it's used for both regions then. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 19:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wrap "Los Angeles, California" in parenthesis
  • Flat list template is unnecessary, removing it produces the same result
  • "from his third studio album" → "for his third studio album"
  • To whom is he confessing this for?
  • "One reviewer lauded Iglesias' vocals" → "Upon "Esperanza"'s release, one reviewer lauded Iglesias' vocals"
  • "A music video for "Esperanza" was filmed in Malibu, California and directed by Emmanuel Lubezki. The music video won Video of the Year" → "Filmed in Malibu, California, the accompanying music video for "Esperanza" was directed by Emmanuel Lubezki, which won Video of the Year" with the pipe
  • ". It also was a top-five hit in" → ", while becoming top-five hit in"

Background and composition

[edit]
  • "at the Ocean Way Recording" → "at Ocean Way Recording"
  • "who previous worked on Iglesias's previous records." → "who had previously worked with Iglesias on his past records."
  • AGF for offline sources
  • "The song was later included on Iglesias'" → "The song was later included on Iglesias's"
  • Link AllMusic on each of its sources

Promotion and reception

[edit]
  • Link lead single
  • Link Malibu, California
  • I suggest adding a bit more about the music video itself
  • "The Monitor Russell McCrory felt that" → "Russell McCrory from The Monitor felt that"
  • Add year of his debut single in parenthesis
  • I suggest tweaking wording to avoid choppy sentences
  • Write out the name of the tour and add the years it was held in parenthesis
  • "In Latin America," → "Commercially, in Latin America,"
  • "It reached the summit on the week" → "It reached the number one position on the chart in the week"
  • Wording needs to be tweaked here: "It spent four consecutive weeks in this position being replaced by "Ciega, Sordomuda" by Shakira."
  • "The track also reached the top of the Latin Pop Airplay chart where it also spent a total of four weeks in this position." → "The track additionally peaked atop the Latin Pop Airplay chart for four [consecutive] / [nonconsecutive] weeks." (which ever it be)

Charts

[edit]
  • I don't think Notimex needs to be linked for every entry per MOS:OVERLINK

Track listing

[edit]

Looks good! (I forgot about this when I first looked at it, but track listing should be wrapped in quotes.)

See also

[edit]

Good

Refs

[edit]
  • Add trans-titles to Spanish sources
  • Remove publishers from Billboard refs
  • In ref 10, replace "videotape" with "online video"
@Nkon21: Could you please have another look at the article? I done some changes that you suggested except for overlinking AllMusic. The lack of sources on the music video makes it hard for me to write more except to expanded the synopsis a bit. Erick (talk) 02:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Magiciandude: Okay, I just did a bit of copyediting in the article. Per MOS:REFLINK, there is no problem with repeating the same link in many citations within an article, but that's not a big deal.  Pass now, good work :) ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 19:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]