This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Sourced information is just that. Information which has a credible source. The information provided in this article by a former Communist government intelligent agent is a credible source. He was in a position to know information that non-communists and regular people wouldn't. This person has no reason to lie and it fits with the other events and historical facts that have come to light during the period of when these incidents happened. To remove this sourced information is wrong. But to remove sourced information and add unsourced information is ludicrous. Please stop removing information that you don't like. Dwain19:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The references to the anti-Hochhuth article of Ion Mihai Pacepa („National Review“, Jan. 25, 2007) and the allegations that "'The Deputy' was part of the Soviet plan to defame Pope Pius XII" should be reconsidered. A deletion of this sparsely reliable source would be reasonable. German conservative historian Thomas Brechenmacher (not anticlerical and far from being a Hochhuth-apologist) strongly challenges the plausibility of Pacepa in the foremost German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung ("Hochhuths Quellen. War der 'Stellvertreter' vom KGB inspiriert?", in: F.A.Z., April 26, 2007) with reference to numerous „inconsistencies“ (the files on Pius XII. were still treasured in the Vatican’s state secretariat in 1960, Casaroli still played a subaltern role at that time and could hardly have given Romanian spymasters insight into these documents, Hochhuth’s documentary appendix “Historical Sidelights” goes back on sources „that were available in print at that time”, etc.).--Diggindeeper13:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why have the circumstances of Piscator's migration from the USSR to France in 1936 been deleted? This information was sourced with a passage from a book by scholar Christopher Innes. If no valid reason is provided it will be reinserted. --Diggindeeper (talk) 12:23, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]