Jump to content

Talk:Eric Johnson (Texas politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Eric Johnson (Texas politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:12, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

saw this pic on commons

[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eric_Johnson_2018.jpg It's been a while but I'll figure out how to add a pic to the page. LaceyUF (talk) 10:16, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:53, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Accomplishments Section

[edit]

The section of the article labeled 'Accomplishments' is clearly not unbiased, and reads like it was written by the Mayor's team. I propose removing the section entirely and moving factual and well sourced info into the 'First Term' section 2603:7000:AA00:20C5:74ED:C1F6:E89B:F2EE (talk) 20:26, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concur. The section is replete with WP:PUFFERY and WP:SYNTHESIS. Carguychris (talk) 20:54, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The word "accomplishments" should be changed to political career, or something similar that describes the policies the mayor supported. Although I disagree that the whole section should be deleted as most items are sourced. As per modifying the wording, as long as the sources do not directly attribute certain policies to the mayor, then any respective statement should also be worded to reflect the source. Although a lot of the section is also listing the Mayor's position and policies he enacted for different areas. I see it no differently from other U.S. Mayors that enacted policies supporting abortion acess, healthcare policy, addressing homelessness, etc. Furthermore, most of the statements seem to be referencing things the mayor is attributed with enacting, seeking funding, etc. which is not biased. ChaoticTexan (talk) 20:55, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I just realized I was conflating the First Term Section with the statements directly under accomplishments. I rewrote some of the statements and tried to delete biased statements that reference Eric Johnson's own words or policies from his own perspective within articles. Some sources are also opinion pieces. I still disagree with deleting the whole section as it can be rewritten to be unbiased, and should be relabeled with a more neutral section header. ChaoticTexan (talk) 21:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Funny how it only became puffery and biased when he announced he was changing his registration to the Republican party. Before that, I suppose it was just the facts. 67.182.243.39 (talk) 02:22, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hard concurrence. Why is this NOW "not unbiased?" Curious timing. 2603:6011:C003:1256:1416:35D0:F8DE:F885 (talk) 02:21, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't it possible that the article was always substandard and no one noticed until his party switch led people to his wikipedia a page and notice how flawed it is 2603:7000:AA00:20C5:F9CC:CB5E:5969:B533 (talk) 18:47, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Political Party" classification

[edit]

The page currently claims two political party classifications, for before and after 2023, however no political parties are involved in the nonpartisan election that elected Johnson as Mayor, NOR does the state of Texas offer a choice of political party to enter on one's voter registration, so neither classification has a basis. 192.34.130.57 (talk) 21:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nonetheless, he holds an elective office, and has been affiliated with two different parties; so the only reason to delete the information would be to conceal his party switch (D to R), which occurred in very interesting personal circumstances. 104.202.165.231 (talk) 15:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]