Talk:Erase–remove idiom

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Erase–remove idiom article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

C/C++ Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject C/C++, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of C and C++ topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.C/C++Wikipedia:WikiProject C/C++Template:WikiProject C/C++C/C++ articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article falls within the scope of C++.

When the first element to be removed is encountered, all subsequent elements are moved forward by one element, leaving a moved-from element at the end; when the second element to be removed is encountered, subsequent elements are again moved forward by one element; and so on and so forth.

The point of erase-remove is to avoid all this shifting/moving. Have a look at the implementation before undoing again.

Yes, you are right. Sorry I did not see this the first time. But please provide an edit comment the next time you remove content from an article. Thanks. – Tea2min (talk) 20:27, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

This technique is very specific to the C++ library, and reads a lot like how-to advice, and sure enough, the main sources for it are a book entitled Effective STL and other sources of advice for users. It seems to me that it would be more suitable as part of a Wikibooks article on C++ programming than in Wikipedia. --Macrakis (talk) 16:28, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]