Talk:Environmental impact of wind power
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Environmental impact of wind power article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Undid revert by Serten and added comment to that section
[edit]Wiki Education assignment: Cold War Science
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 6 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ablerini (article contribs).
Why I rewrote the bird section down a 3 paragraph summary
[edit]15 paras for birds and only one for marine life was not fair
Studies repeated info or were contradictory (e.g. night migrants more problem than day or not)
Too many names and numbers
No mention of some modern deterrents such as ultrasound
Siting importance needed stressing
Many readers would give up part way through I think Chidgk1 (talk) 19:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Article issues and classification
[edit]- The article is tagged as lacking reliable references from February 2017, June 2022, September 2022, and November 2022, in need of updating from September 2022 and November 2022, limited geographic scope from September 2022, needing clarification from September and November 2022. The B-class criteria #1 states;
The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited.
and #4,The article is reasonably well-written.
. Reassess to C-class. -- Otr500 (talk) 16:57, 1 March 2023 (UTC)- I just performed a copyedit on the article. I agree with the analysis above and note that now the article is also beginning to suffer from needing updating as well. Countercheck (talk) 16:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- C-Class energy articles
- High-importance energy articles
- C-Class Environment articles
- High-importance Environment articles
- C-Class mammal articles
- High-importance mammal articles
- C-Class Bat articles
- High-importance Bat articles
- Bats task force articles
- WikiProject Mammals articles
- C-Class physics articles
- High-importance physics articles
- C-Class physics articles of High-importance
- C-Class fluid dynamics articles
- Fluid dynamics articles
- C-Class Climate change articles
- Low-importance Climate change articles
- WikiProject Climate change articles