Talk:Emily Gernild

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 7 January 2023 by reviewer Theroadislong (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Painting (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Painting, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.PaintingWikipedia:WikiProject PaintingTemplate:WikiProject PaintingPainting

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists

re-created by Moceroci

To editor Theroadislong: I was involved in deleting a prior version of this article. Could you explain your reasoning for accepting this draft? Chris Troutman (talk) 22:09, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Chris troutman: They seem to pass WP:NARTIST with work in the permanent collections of The Danish Arts Foundation, Trapholt Museum for Modern Art and Kastrupgårdsamlingen, happy for you to take it to AFD if you disagree. Theroadislong (talk) 08:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is further information needed to verify the female artist provenance within more institutions and publications etc? Moceroci (talk) 19:20, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not concerned with the gender of the subject. Notability for artists criterion number four says "The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums." This article does not make plain that to be true. Show us where her works are in several notable galleries or museums. Exhibitions are not enough unless they were in a significant exhibition. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:16, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The text clearly states that her work is part of the permanent collections of The Danish Arts Foundation, Trapholt Museum for Modern Art and Kastrupgårdsamlingen. These are some of the most recognised institutions in Denmark. The link to Trapholt even includes an interview with the Director talking about the painting that they acquired. The artist is represented by Galleri Bo Bjerggaard which is one of the most recognised in Denmark - they represent the artists Per Kirkeby and Tal R among others. Can you let me know why these are not notable? Moceroci (talk) 22:41, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This edit of yours provided needed sourcing, although we're still falling short of "several" permanent collections. I imagine based upon my recent experience that this would survive AfD. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you let me know why these are not notable? Please can you let me know why the box at the top of the article has not been removed. Do you need further information or credible sources? Moceroci (talk) 15:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have already explained notability above. Of course, an editor like you who has a conflict of interest worries about the banner. That maintenance template is there to tell other editors that the paid contributions of folks like you have marred the article, and that a disinterested third party will need to check the content against the sources to verify the article honestly summarizes the sources. The template stays there until one of our experienced editors removes it. This is the price paid by those trying to use Wikipedia for advertisement. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) Chris Troutman (talk) 21:26, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have not been paid to create this contribution and there is no conflict. I look forward to the experienced editors reviewing the article. Thank you. Moceroci (talk) 08:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]