Talk:Embassy of the United States, London

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Cairo would be the second largest U.S. Embassy. Second only to Baghdad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Millfam (talk) 02:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone know the times which, in general the Embassy is open (for visa interviews etc.), is it open on Saturdays? Sundays? What are the hours of opening? Just so one can plan ahead when asking for a particular day when booking and appointment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.114.226.172 (talk) 09:10, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership of the land

The article states that the Duke of Westminster refused to sell the land on which the embassy stands to the USA unless they returned to him land confiscated from his family in the Revolutionary War. The cited reference, an article in the Guardian, however, says:

[T]he Grosvenor Estate refused to let the Americans acquire the freehold on the site they had chosen, as was their practice with embassies, because, it has been said ever since, the Grosvenor family had had property in the United States confiscated two centuries earlier during the American War of Independence.

The phrase `because, it has been said ever since,' denotes that the Guardian is merely reporting a persistent rumour, not stating a fact. Also, the rumour reported is not the one quoted in the article: the Guardian says that the sale was refused because the USA confiscated land in the past; the article says that the sale would be allowed if that land were returned. To be honest, it sounds like an urban legend, to me. Dricherby (talk) 13:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have sourced a new reference^[1] to give credibility to the previously unsourced or mis-sourced information tidbit.Esasus (talk) 14:54, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Chris Roberts, Heavy Words Lightly Thrown: The Reason Behind Rhyme, Thorndike Press,2006 (ISBN 0-7862-8517-6)

new building by kieran timberlake

here is the link to his website about it.

http://blog.kierantimberlake.com/2010/02/new-us-embassy-in-london/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.253.227.33 (talk) 17:32, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Embassy of the United States, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Embassy of the United States, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Responsibility for the New Embassy Compound (NEC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just removed a rather misleading line that was probably inserted as a counter to Trumps assertion that the sale of the Embassy was a "bad deal." The Embassy's move spanned several administrations, and to "blame" any one administration misses the complexity of an embassy move.

v/r — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heavydpj (talk • contribs) 04:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Embassy of the United States, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect geographic coordinates

The geographic coordinates, 51.4826N, 0.1317E given in the article apparently are incorrect. Linking the coordinates to Google maps and OpenStreetMaps gives a location in Bexley Borough in the area of West Heath. According to the article, the old Embassy is located in Mayfair and the new Embassy is in the Nine Elms area of Wandsworth Borough.--TGC55 (talk) 17:47, 15 January 2018 (UTC) Minor spacing correction. --TGC55 (talk) 10:36, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected coordinates from East to West.--TGC55 (talk) 18:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source

Would you folks consider skeptics.stackexchange.com to be a reliable source? It has been used in reference #31 to cite information about Obama and Trump and seems unreliable. Before I did anything I thought I'd ask. Thanks ~Alfie Cooper~ 23:00, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Chris Roberts, Heavy Words Lightly Thrown: The Reason Behind Rhyme, Thorndike Press,2006 (ISBN 0-7862-8517-6)

[1]