This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Many bilateral-relations articles have a corresponding embassy article. Can I ask why you tolerate them? Do you think they are more important than the others? If so, please explain how they are more important than the others. Also, {{Diplomatic missions of the United States}} already has many articles. If you want to delete the Brazilian one, please prove it is less important than any of them. Similarly, Category:Diplomatic missions in Brasília has six articles apart from the U.S. one, which one do you think is more important than ths U.S. one? LightningNThunder (talk) 06:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]