Talk:Ellen Gates Starr

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

ArtAndFeminism

This article was created or improved at an Art+Feminism edit-a-thon in 2016.ArtAndFeminismWikipedia:Meetup/ArtAndFeminismTemplate:ArtAndFeminism articleArtAndFeminism articles

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright?

isen't this same information found on www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/USAWstarr.htm? And when I say same information, I mean word for word. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.168.156.37 (talk) 03:14, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal relationships

Recently a contributor has removed any references in the article to Adams's relationship with Rozet. I don't care either way whether the article includes this information. But I do want to make sure due process is followed. In support of the textual insertion a verifiable source has been quoted; and supporting evidence presented. If someone wants to add an additional source refuting the claim, then they are welcome to do so. But to remove text and references without citing justification is simply pushing a POV agenda. Please can we keep this evidence-based. Contaldo80 (talk) 12:02, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And not lobg after the article was edited for historical fairness someone desperate for Starr and Adams to be gay vandalized the page.

I don't know who has made the comment above I'm afraid - as it is unsigned. However, despite offering to engage in constructive debate - we have ended up in a position close to vandalism. I am not 'desperate for Starr or Adams to be gay'. I am equally not desperate for them NOT to be gay. I simply have made a contribution based on academic evidence. If someone has evidence to the contrary then please use it and amend the article. The continued absence of this, however, is unconstructive. Contaldo80 (talk) 14:32, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Catholicism

I am not disputing her catholicism (even though you have not provided a soruce). What is objectionable is removing the LGBT category (which is better sourced ironically) while replacing it at the same time with the catholicism category. These are 2 separate and un-related actions; and they will continue to be reverted until you treat them as such. Contaldo80 (talk) 08:39, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"but she was not a member of their religious community (or any other)." Several sources say she was in a lay-order of a kind, Benedictine Oblate, though.[1][2][3][4] Is that different?--T. Anthony (talk) 05:44, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sexual relationship of Ellen Gates Starr

It was claimed (actually speculated) in the article that Starr was a lesbian and had particularly close relationship with Addams. No sources were provided and hence I have reverted the twice, here and here. I have asked the editor (on my talkpage here) to discuss the update here before proceeding further and also asked for apt sources. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 15:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Except the source is there: "The Education of Jane Addams" p361. Try paying attention to what's going on! Contaldo80 (talk) 15:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a speculative update and I am not in support of this update (without citing apt online sources); that too with good reasons as to why a "speculation" should be added to the article. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 09:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's fairly well accepted that they were domestic partners. And several academics have noted the strong romantic element to the relationship. This isn't speculation. The only thing we don't know is what they did in bed. So can we be mature about dealing with issues about homosexuality without relegating them to the insulting description of "speculation". In any case the sources are all there. If you are arguing that Starr was heterosexual then you are free to provide a source to back up that claim. Contaldo80 (talk) 08:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]