Talk:Elisha
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Elisha article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 730 days ![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The {} sign/s
[edit]One or more of the sign/s: {{NPOV}}{{expansion}}{{Cleanup}} placed on this page without any discussion, explanation or reasoning have been removed pending further discussion. (The category Category:Bible stories is now up for a vote for deletion at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Bible stories) Thank you. IZAK 11:02, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
File:The Miracle at the Grave of Elisha by Jan Nagel (d 1602).jpg to appear as POTD soon
[edit]Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:The Miracle at the Grave of Elisha by Jan Nagel (d 1602).jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 26, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-09-26. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Shown here is The Miracle at the Grave of Elisha, an oil painting on panel which was completed by the Dutch painter Jan Nagel in 1596. It depicts part of the Biblical account of Elisha, a miracle that occurred after his death. Following 2 Kings 13:21, the painting shows a dead man who was "revived, and stood up on his feet" after touching Elisha's interred bones.Painting: Jan Nagel
Historicity
[edit]The article omits any discussion on the historicity of Elisha but the general tone suggests that Elisha did indeed live as described. Can somebody elaborate and introduce a proper subsection on this topic? Thank you all.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.103.156.73 (talk) 14:42, 26 September 2017
- Seconded. —PaleoNeonate – 22:02, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Article needs attention
[edit]Minimal use of scholarly sources IncandescentBliss (talk) 02:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Elisha's Spring is a... spring is a spring, not the nearby touristic fountain
[edit]Sinclairian, hi. I have no issue with you, so please, what's your issue with me? Do a search. The spring is a spring, not a touristic fountain connected to the city main and some distance away. Wiki Commons JPG names aren't RS, to be sure.
There were half a dozen Wikipedia pages who were tricked into either using the name of the fountain (it's never been a fountain!), and sometimes pictures of that same fake site as illustration, for instance 2 Kings 2, the Ein es-Sultan spring, prophet Elisha, Tell es-Sultan archaeological site & UNESCO World Heritage Site, the Ein es-Sultan camp, in several different languages - and I think I'm missing some. It took me a lot of time to fix them all. The local owner of the shop & restaurant there uses the fountain built by him as a magnet for tourists ("tourist trap"). Excellent for him, but not for an encyclopedia. The real spring is a short distance away and has been enclosed in a building for protection by some European Community development agency, and to get inside you need to pay a fee. The nearby shop & restaurant owner had the smart idea to create the free-access fountain on the side of his parking lot, fed by water from the public water system. Most of Jericho gets its water through pipes connected to that spring, so every tap in Jericho has as good a claim to be "Elisha's Spring" as that parking lot contraption. Cheers, Arminden (talk) 15:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Cite a source and stop taking every challenge like a personal attack. Sinclairian (talk) 15:18, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- "According to who? Something reputable or, just you?"
- Your edit summary. I call this nasty. Very nasty. And unprovoked. Not making up anything.
- Why should I do more work? Tamar Hayardeni took both pictures, at both sites; there is no base for preferring the other based on what was here already. The previous choice was presumably based on aesthetics, mine on knowing both places. Neither is RS if you insist, so you might as well delete the picture. But you have a shadox-boxing match to fight, or so it seams. I don't. Arminden (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
HB-OT difference?
[edit]The article claims that Elisha's story is told in 2 Kings 2-14. Maybe that's the case with the Hebrew Bible, although I doubt it, and not with the OT, where it's contained in 1 Kings 19, and 2 Kings 2-9+13, nothing about him in 2K10, 11, 12 and certainly not 14. I think it's a mistake and should be removed. Arminden (talk) 08:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class Judaism articles
- Top-importance Judaism articles
- C-Class Islam-related articles
- High-importance Islam-related articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- C-Class Christianity articles
- High-importance Christianity articles
- C-Class Saints articles
- High-importance Saints articles
- WikiProject Saints articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- C-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Bible articles
- Top-importance Bible articles
- WikiProject Bible articles
- C-Class Religion articles
- Top-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- C-Class Ancient Near East articles
- Top-importance Ancient Near East articles
- Ancient Near East articles by assessment