Talk:Electoral Finance Act 2007

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand law task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

"Generally speaking, support and opposition for the legislation has followed predictable ideological and philosophical cleavages. Apart from the New Zealand Anti-Vivisection Society and NORML New Zealand, there are few left-wing organisations that oppose this legislation. The Direct Democracy Party of New Zealand also opposes the bill."

This paragraph has a strong bias to it, and should be edited to be neutral - 60.234.211.172 (talk) 06:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)MikeE[reply]

Reasons for various edits:

Reference to John Boscawen's links to the BRT were removed due to relevence. He is not acting on behalf or with the BRT and therefore the link is irrelevent for this topic. It would certainly be relevent in his own profile however. Annette King's links to Trade Unions are not deemed relevent to this article for example...

Secondly, while "predominantly the Right" is referenced. The article that is linked to mentions nothing about the political orientation of the protestors.

Thirdly, the Electoral Commission has NOT "dropped its criticisms of the Bill". Helene Catt was pleased with Annette King for giving an interpretation (as was mentioned in the reference article) however Annette King has since admitted her interpretation may have been wrong and was only a 'personal opinion'. NB, in this article from one day after the referenced one, http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/1/story.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10479268 that the Commission is still seeking clarification and that while Annette King has pledged to give an interpretation before the bill is passed, this has still not happened.

Wikipedia users should be careful about accepting facts simply because they are referenced. it is important to ensure that the reference actually says what it is alledged that it does and that there isn't more up to date information that conflicts with it.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.22.18.241 (talk) 07:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note to editors of this page: the supposed quotation from me on the page ("nazi" etc) is taken so much out of context that it completely changes the meaning. This mischievous citing of me has been pointed out publicly already and it is disappointing to see it here. Can it please be removed? signed Nicky Hager203.97.100.250 22:32, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Lholden 01:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposing Move

The page should/will be updated following the passage of the bill today, however, I suggest we move this page to Electoral Finance Act. Thoughts? Objections? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Quadparty (talk • contribs) 09:20, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Lholden (talk) 07:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Links wrong...

I would have thought that the pages in the External Links that have the wording of the Bill should be changed to pages that have the wording of the Act. There was alot of changes made in the last minute, and these pages may not be the most accurate versions available. Drkshadowmaster Contributions Talk Page 06:50, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Electoral Finance Act 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071010025853/http://cog.org.nz:80/ to http://www.cog.org.nz

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Electoral Finance Act 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:05, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]