Talk:Edmund Wagner
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Edmund Wagner article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Edmund Wagner be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Notability
[edit]Does not meet WP:SOLDIER & sig RS coverage not found: llink. All victories apparently achieved on the Eastern Front where Luftwaffe was flying against poorly trained pilots operating obsolete aircraft, so a high number of claims is not remarkable. Did not hold a significant command.
No de.wiki article. Please also see a note at MilHist Talk Archives for background behind the redirect. In summary, per the outcome of the discussion at Notability:People on notability of Knight's Cross recipients: permalink, certain recipients were deemed non notable and WP:SOLDIER has been modified accordingly: diff. The articles of these recipients are being redirected to alphabetical lists. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Notable due to his status as a Flying ace with a high claimed kills counts. As you can see in List of World War II flying aces - flyers with a much smaller kill count have articles - with the notability being their kill count and nothing else. Being an aerial ace (with a significant count for a particular conflict - 5 would be borderline for WWII, but would confer significance in any other conflict - mid-double digits and up for WWII is clearly significant). notable per SOLDIER: " Played an important role in a significant military event such as a major battle or campaign" - kill counts of these magnitude are a significant material and personnel (aviation - expensive to train) advantage. Soviets were competitive in the air from the end of 1942 and onward - and in event taking out a regiment sized enemy force - Aviation regiment (Soviet Union) single handed is significant regardless of opposition quality.Icewhiz (talk) 10:42, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Redirect
[edit]Restoring the redirect. Successful completion of missions (sorties flown, # of enemy aircraft shot down, etc) is not part of SOLDIER. A MilHist RfC on this topic has failed to gain consensus in May of 2017:
For a relevant AfD, please see:
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fritz Lüddecke, which closed as "Delete" in September 2017.
Please also see the discussion with the editor who had earlier objected to the redirect:
- Link.
- Stub-Class aviation articles
- Stub-Class aerospace biography articles
- Aerospace biography task force articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- Stub-Class military history articles
- Stub-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- Stub-Class biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- Stub-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Stub-Class German military history articles
- German military history task force articles
- Stub-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs of military-people
- Wikipedia requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- Wikipedia requested images